Why do some folks think that Gardasil hasn’t eliminated cervical cancer in Australia yet?
“New research from Cancer Council NSW, being presented this week at the International Papilloma Virus Conference (IPVC 2018) in Sydney and published in The Lancet Public Health, has shown that if vaccination and screening coverage are maintained at their current rates, cervical cancer is likely to be eliminated as a public health issue within 20 years.
The new research predicts that cervical cancer rates will drop to less than 6 in 100,000 by 2022 – meaning that it will soon be considered a rare cancer. Rates will continue to drop further, dropping below 4 in 100,000 by 2035. These findings indicate that Australia is on-track to be the first country in the world to eliminate cervical cancer by successfully implementing a combined approach to vaccination and screening.”Australia set to eliminate cervical cancer by 2035
Maybe it is because Gardasil really hasn’t yet eliminated cervical cancer in Australia…
Has Gardasil Really Eliminated Cervical Cancer in Australia?
Wait, so why is anyone trying to say that something that hasn’t happened yet isn’t true?
Perhaps “Dr. Reichert” just misspoke and did say that Australia had already eliminated cervical cancer instead of that they were on their way to eliminating cervical cancer…
It is true, after all. Australia is really on their way to eliminating cervical cancer thanks to the HPV vaccine!
What about all of the slides and tables that Bobby Kennedy included with his post?
Does Slide 1 really show a terrifying increased risk of cervical cancer?
Of course not.
It actually shows how thoroughly vaccines are tested before they are approved!
In this case, they were evaluating “the potential of Gardasil to enhance cervical disease in subjects who had evidence of persistent infection with vaccine-relevant HPV types prior to vaccination.”
And although Bobby Kennedy is claiming that is what they found, the women in the Gardasil group (6.5%) were much more likely to have a Pap test with HSIL (high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) as those in the placebo group (3.7%) at the start of the trial! That’s before they were vaccinated and that’s why they were more likely to have cervical cancer. Remember, the HPV vaccines prevent cervical cancer. They do not treat cervical cancer.
Bobby Kennedy left this out, but during these trials, when they looked at other subgroups, they “did not raise a concern about enhancement of cervical disease due to HPV.”
And Bobby Kennedy‘s other slides?
In Slide 2, just after telling you to look at the vaccine insert, he claims that “nearly half of all women have had prior exposure to HPV – with 38% being exposed before age 10.”
Is that in the vaccine insert?
Nope, it comes from a small study he found, Genital HPV in Children and Adolescents: Does Sexual Activity Make a Difference?, which says that “sexual activity was associated with increased risk for genital high-risk HPV infection.”
Surprisingly, the study did find that some girls somehow had exposure to HPV even though they were not sexually active and some, even while they were prepubertal.
“The finding of asymptomatic HPV DNA in children, and correlation with live virus, infectivity, or disease is unclear.”Jayasinghe et al on Genital warts in children: what do they mean?
Again, Bobby Kennedy leaves out the fact that almost all other studies have found that prepubertal kids and those who are not sexually active are negative for HPV.
And Bobby Kennedy‘s other slides?
Did rates of cervical cancer increase “in the vaccinated group (20-24)” just after the start of a school vaccination campaign?
“Screening from age 20 yrs, rather than from age 25 yrs, would not prevent any more cancers from spreading beyond the cervix (stage II or worse) by age 27 yrs. The substantial increase in stage I cervical cancers in 24 and 25 year old women, corresponds to changes whereby a high proportion of women are now screened for the first time between ages 24.5 and 25.5 yrs. Previously some of these early stage screen detected cancers would have been prevented by treatment of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia following earlier screening and a few would have been screen-detected later – at age 26 or 27 yrs. Others may be slow-growing cancers, some of which could be argued to be over-diagnosed.”Castanon et al on Is the recent increase in cervical cancer in women aged 20–24 years in England a cause for concern?
It kind of did, but only in the lowest grades and because they changed the ages for when these women were screened!
“Reassuringly no increase in stage II or worse cancers was observed in women under age 27 yrs. In fact, numbers of stage II or worse cancers diagnosed at age 24.5–25.0 yrs in 2014 are lower than in any other year since 2007.”Castanon et al on Is the recent increase in cervical cancer in women aged 20–24 years in England a cause for concern?
And that’s not all they found!
Wait, Bobby Kennedy doesn’t mention that rates of cervical cancer are getting lower since 2007…
“Amidst these changes HPV vaccination was introduced in 2008 for girls aged 12–13 with catch-up for those aged 14–18.”Castanon et al on Is the recent increase in cervical cancer in women aged 20–24 years in England a cause for concern?
What else happened since 2007?
That’s right. That’s about when we started vaccinating girls with the HPV vaccine.
A vaccine that has been very well studied since to see it’s effects on cervical cancer, including a large meta-analysis of 65 studies in 14 countries.
“More than 10 years have elapsed since human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination was implemented. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of the population-level impact of vaccinating girls and women against human papillomavirus on HPV infections, anogenital wart diagnoses, and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ (CIN2+) to summarise the most recent evidence about the effectiveness of HPV vaccines in real-world settings and to quantify the impact of multiple age-cohort vaccination.”Brisson et al on Population-level impact and herd effects following the introduction of human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
What did they find?
They found “compelling evidence of the substantial impact of HPV vaccination programmes on HPV infections and CIN2+ among girls and women, and on anogenital warts diagnoses among girls, women, boys, and men.”
“In countries like the UK, Australia, and Canada there has been dramatic reduction in HPV related infections and diseases, while in countries with very low coverage there has been very little impact.”Marc Brisson on HPV vaccine: high coverage could eradicate cervical cancer within decades, say researchers
HPV vaccines are safe and effective and they prevent cancer!
Why are some folks still trying to scare parents away from vaccinating and protecting their kids with these necessary vaccines?
More on Gardasil Eliminating Cervical Cancer in Australia
- I’m Not Anti-Vaccine, I Just Don’t Believe in the HPV Vaccine
- Is the HPV Vaccine a Savior or the Most Dangerous Vaccine Ever Made?
- HPV Vaccine Myths
- What Happens If You Get Gardasil and Already Have HPV?
- Does HPV Vaccination Decrease the Chances You Will Get a Pap Test?
- Should You Get an Extra Dose of Gardasil9?
- HPV vaccine fear mongering in an anti-vax book – a critical review
- Australia set to eliminate cervical cancer by 2035
- WHO – WHO leads the way towards the elimination of cervical cancer as a public health concern
- Study – Genital HPV in Children and Adolescents: Does Sexual Activity Make a Difference?
- Study – Prevalence of HPV in Adolescents Virgins and Sexually Active at a University Hospital in the City of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Study – Age of Acquiring Causal Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Infections: Leveraging Simulation Models to Explore the Natural History of HPV-induced Cervical Cancer
- Study – Genital warts in children: what do they mean?
- Study – Population-level impact and herd effects following the introduction of human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
- HPV vaccine: high coverage could eradicate cervical cancer within decades, say researchers
- Is the recent increase in cervical cancer in women aged 20–24 years in England a cause for concern?
- Ask the Experts about Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccines
- Gardasil facts – debunking myths about HPV vaccine safety and efficacy
- HPV vaccination works. Period.
- Another study shows no link between HPV vaccine and autoimmune diseases