Crisis or Crossroads at the Cochrane Collaboration?

Not surprisingly, Peter Gøtzsche has had some defenders.

“A scandal has erupted within the Cochrane Collaboration, the world’s most prestigious scientific organisation devoted to independent reviews of health care interventions. One of its highest profile board members has been sacked, resulting in four other board members staging a mass exodus.”

Maryanne Demasi, PhD on Cochrane – A sinking ship?

Who is Maryanne Demasi?

“DISCLOSURE: Maryanne Demasi is a science reporter and a researcher working with Prof Peter C. Gøtzsche, the Nordic Cochrane Centre, and was present in Edinburgh at the time of the meeting, but not present in the discussion room.”

Oh…

Someone who works with Peter Gøtzsche is defending him. That doesn’t sound too surprising.

It is also not surprising the way that some folks are describing Peter Gøtzsche’s expulsion, saying that it was only about his behavior and not his work.

Did Peter Gøtzsche get expelled because of his work or behavior?
Did Peter Gøtzsche get expelled because of his work or behavior?

But the problem wasn’t that he wrote a critique of a Cochrane HPV meta-analsysis, but that his critique was so poorly done!

“I think it’s a hatchet job by people with several axes to grind, that needed better editorial peer review. I would be surprised if Cochrane’s investigation and update resulted in changed conclusions.”

Hilda Bastian on The HPV Vaccine: A Critique of a Critique of a Meta-Analysis

A hatchet job by people with several axes to grind…

Not the kind of work you would expect from a member of the Governing Board of the Cochrane Collaboration, especially after most of the same charges were refuted when they were made against the European Medicines Agency.

Did Peter Gøtzsche allow a bias against screening for cancer harm the Cochrane Collaboration?
Did Peter Gøtzsche allow a bias against screening for cancer harm the Cochrane Collaboration?

And it wasn’t even the first time that he was accused of harming the Cochrane Collaboration .

“Cochrane wishes to state unequivocally that the views Professor Gøtzsche has expressed on the benefits and harms of psychiatric drugs are not those of the organization. As primarily a research organization Cochrane does not make clinical recommendations and we have not done so on this issue.”

Statement from Cochrane

How many times has the Cochrane Collaboration had to distance itself from the views of its Board Members?

How many times has the Cochrane Collaboration had to distance itself from the views and work of Peter Gøtzsche and the Nordic Cochrane Collaboration?

More on Peter Gøtzsche

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.