It shouldn’t be surprising that talk of morality comes up around the issue of vaccines from time to time.
“Scientists and clinicians confront moral and ethical choices daily and often observe a religious faith that helps guide their own personal conduct. Indeed, the religious beliefs of countless historical and contemporary researchers and clinicians have been a source of motivation to help relieve human suffering by means of immunization.”
Grabenstein on What the World’s religions teach, applied to vaccines and immune globulins
It is most often because some vaccines do have a “distant historical association with abortion.”
Even then, the National Catholic Bioethics Center states that:
One is morally free to use the vaccine regardless of its historical association with abortion. The reason is that the risk to public health, if one chooses not to vaccinate, outweighs the legitimate concern about the origins of the vaccine. This is especially important for parents, who have a moral obligation to protect the life and health of their children and those around them.
That seems pretty easy to interpret.
They are saying we are both “morally free” to use these vaccines and that we “have a moral obligation” to get vaccinated.
What about those parents who feel like they shouldn’t have to vaccinate their kids, exposing them to the risks of vaccines, simply to “protect the herd?”
“Putting aside arguments about social good, herd immunity, discouraging free loading and preventing harm to others, vaccinating a child for the child’s sake is not just the right thing to do, but also the only thing to do.”
Ogbogu on Vaccines and the Ethics of Parental Choice
They should understand that:
- they aren’t vaccinating their kids just to protect levels of herd immunity in the community – they are also providing their own kids with individual levels of immunity and protection, so it is not just about preventing harm to others
- vaccines are safe, so the risks of getting vaccinated are very low
- by intentionally not vaccinating their own kids, they are free-riding and benefiting from the fact that most of the rest of us do get vaccinated and do vaccinate our kids
And they should understand that there is no ethical way to defend intentionally skipping or delaying their child’s vaccines, which puts kids who can’t be vaccinated at risk.
“The society of the 21st century, just as many societies and cultures in the history of human civilization, use religion as an excuse for wars, discrimination, and now for vaccination refusal.”
Pelčić on Religious exception for vaccination or religious excuses for avoiding vaccination
Although a few folks haven’t gotten the message, and may even lie to get a fake religious vaccine exemption, most others see it the same way.
“Giving children a healthy start in life, no matter where they are born or the circumstances of their birth, is the moral obligation of every one of us. It is heartbreaking to think that three million children die each year from diseases that we can prevent.”
Nelson Mandela (2002 Vaccine Conference)
Most parents vaccinate their kids because they understand that vaccines are safe, vaccines work, and vaccines are necessary, just as they likely also understand that there is a moral obligation to vaccinate.
“The argument relating to public goods can be added to the harm-to-others arguments. Where a public good, such as herd protection, exists we must take care not to damage it. The need to create and maintain such a good provides an additional reason, should one be needed, to argue in favour of a moral obligation for the traveller to be vaccinated in advance for infectious disease.”
Dawson on What are the moral obligations of the traveller in relation to vaccination?
And if there is a moral obligation to get vaccinated, then what does that say about those who push propaganda that scares parents away from vaccinating and protecting their kids?
“The anti-vaccine argument is wrong in both the scientific and moral sense.”
Sarah Kurchak on Here’s How the Anti-Vaccination Movement Hurts Autistic People
Dr. Vytenis Andriukaitis, the EU Health Commissioner, is the latest to call out those in anti-vaccination movements, who he says have the “moral responsibility” for the death of unvaccinated children.
“I would like to draw attention to the fact that all these movements, which use different arguments, do not understand what they are doing. It would be a shame if the families belonging to this movement were to bury their children, as happened this year in the Member States where children have died of measles.
I would like to invite those who are against the vaccines to visit families, to visit the tombs of the children of those families, and to think what they are doing. I would like to invite all these anti-aging movements to visit the European cemeteries of the nineteenth century, of the eighteenth century, beginning of the twentieth century: they will find many tombs of small children, because there were no vaccines.”
Vytenis Andriukaitis, MD (translated from Italian)
This brings to mind another challenge that was made to anti-vaccine activists just over one hundred years ago by Dr. William Osler in his essay Man’s Redemption of Man.
Dr. Osler jokingly proposed a small vaccinated vs unvaccinated study and challenged ten unvaccinated people, including “three anti-vaccination doctors, if they could be found,” to join him in the “next severe epidemic.”
Tragically, Dr. Osler wouldn’t have a hard time finding three anti-vaccination doctors today.
He would have an easy time recognizing their arguments, as they really haven’t changed over the past 100 years.
Neither is the fact that kids are still dying of diseases that are now vaccine-preventable.
What to Know About the Moral Responsibility of the Anti-Vaccine Movement
Many people believe that we have a moral responsibility to protect ourselves, our families, and those around us from vaccine-preventable diseases by getting vaccinated and it is immoral to push misinformation that scares parents away from vaccinating and protecting their kids.
More on the Moral Responsibility of the Anti-Vaccine Movement
- National Catholic Bioethics Center FAQ on the Use of Vaccines
- COMMISSARIO UE: “NO VAX CI RIPORTANO ALL’ETà DELLA PIETRA”
- Here’s How the Anti-Vaccination Movement Hurts Autistic People
- Vaccines: Personal Choice Or Moral Responsibility?
- Address by Nelson Mandela at Vaccine Conference
- Vaccination Is a Moral Good, Not a Political Football
- Andrew Wakefield: Don’t try to blame me for the results of what I said and did
- A moral obligation to vaccinate
- Getting Vaccine a Moral Responsibility
- Getting Vaccinated Is a Moral Obligation
- Vaccines and the Ethics of Parental Choice
- What are the moral obligations of the traveller in relation to vaccination?
- Ethics of Vaccinations Bioethics Project
- Ethical Issues With Vaccination for the Obstetrician–Gynecologist
- Ethical Issues and Vaccines
- You Can Be the Pro-Life Parent of a Fully Vaccinated Child
- Catholics urged to remember ‘common good’ in vaccine debate
- Vaccine refuseniks are free-riders.
- Human Cell Strains in Vaccine Development
- Vatican Statement on Vaccines Derived From Aborted Human Fetuses
- Cultural Perspectives on Vaccination
- Science, Superstition and the Duty to Vaccinate
- The ethical negligence of parents who refuse to vaccinate their children
- Vaccine refusal is unethical
- Revoke the license of any doctor who opposes vaccination
- Talking about Vaccines: Religious Concerns
- The ethics and morals of vaccination
- Study – What the world’s religions teach, applied to vaccines and immune globulins.
- Study – Religious exception for vaccination or religious excuses for avoiding vaccination
1 thought on “The Moral Responsibility of the Anti-Vaccine Movement”
How can anyone say vaccines are safe when no vaccine on the current CDC schedule has ever been safety tested against a control group that received an inert placebo? In every test, there was either no control group or the control group received a different vaccine, or the adjuvant contained in the subject vaccine. It appears to be an intentional deception to hide the harm of a vaccine by saying it didn’t cause more harm then another vaccine. That’s like saying, 2 bullets to the head is safe because the number of deaths was not greater than the number of deaths from 1 bullet to the head. Efficacy test are similarly faked by never testing to see if the vaccine actually prevents the disease. Instead they define “efficacy” as “stimulating antibodies” but that is not a predictor or immunity,