Are vaccines unavoidably unsafe?
What does that even mean?
Unavoidably Unsafe Vaccines
Folks should first understand that it is a term used by lawyers, not doctors.
“Basically, it means that there is nothing that can be done to make the product safer without compromising the function of the product. The term comes from the legal document, “Restatement (Second) of Torts, Section 402A,” and it is about protecting manufacturers from frivolous law suits, not about providing consumers with health information. The basic idea is simply that companies cannot be held accountable for an injury that arises from unavoidably unsafe products because there was nothing that the company could have done to prevent that injury (inherent in this term is the requirement that the product was manufactured correctly, labelled correctly with adequate instructions for how to administer it, etc.).”
Vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe,” but that doesn’t mean they are dangerous
It came up again in a recent Supreme Court case that reaffirmed that vaccines are safe.
Remember, these vaccines are FDA approved and have been found to be safe.
The unavoidably unsafe thing relates to liability and doesn’t mean that vaccines are in any way dangerous or risky.
More on Unavoidably Unsafe Vaccines
- Can Parents Still Sue Vaccine Manufacturers?
- Understanding the Vaccine Injury Table
- About Those Lawsuits That Almost Put Vaccine Manufacturers out of Business
- Anti-Vaccine Points Refuted A Thousand Times
- Vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe,” but that doesn’t mean they are dangerous
- Vaccine lawsuits – overview of litigation across the USA
- Vaccines and “Unavoidably Unsafe Products”
- The Supreme Court rules on Bruesewitz v. Wyeth and vaccine injury cases
- Supreme Court decides Bruesewitz v. Wyeth
- Vaccines and “Unavoidably Unsafe Products”
- Ginger Taylor writes a letter about vaccines – this will be interesting.
Last Updated on July 25, 2019