Site icon VAXOPEDIA

The Truth About RSV and Monoclonal Antibodies

Why do some people think that monoclonal antibodies don’t have a long history of use in treating children?

Larry Palevsky is against Beyfortus for RSV because we thinks that we have never used monoclonal antibodies to treat children before. And it seems like he doesn’t really think that RSV causes disease…

The usual suspects…

The Truth About Monoclonal Antibodies

In a screed against protecting children against RSV, a life-threatening disease, one of the reasons Larry Palevsky uses against Beyfortus is that:

“And lastly, Paul, when did we ever use a monoclonal antibody to effectively prevent infection in children and be able to demonstrate that this is going to be able to help kids?”

Larry Palevsky

While Larry Palevsky thinks that there is “no precedence” for giving kids monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to prevent infections, and he wasn’t corrected by Paul Thomas (who is retired because the state board made him surrender his medical license), let me list all of the ways we have given kids monoclonal antibodies to prevent infections:

That’s right.

Synagis, the very expensive, monthly shot that only high risk newborns and infants have been able to get to prevent RSV, is a monoclonal antibody!

We had been giving high risk babies Synagis to protect them from RSV for over 25 years.

It’s true! The kind of monoclonal antibody that Larry Palevsky said that there was “no precedence” for its use, has in fact been in use since 1998!

Not to mention that we have used polyclonal antibodies to protect kids from life-threatening infections, immune deficiencies, and a few other conditions, for even longer.

These include:

Polyclonal antibodies that are especially important when too many people listen to folks like Paul Thomas and Larry Palevsky and end up getting exposed to measles, tetanus, diphtheria, and hepatitis B, etc., when they are unvaccinated.

The Truth About RSV

While Paul Thomas seems skeptical of a lot of the things Larry Palevsky is saying, especially as he seems to be a germ theory denier, that certainly doesn’t mean that you should listen to Thomas either.

His reason for why you should skip Beyfortus?

Paul Thomas claims that RSV is “a disease that is uh basically a bad cold.”

Sure, it’s a “bad cold” that hospitalizes thousands of kids and kills hundreds of infants each year in the United States alone!

Other things Paul Thomas and Larry Palevsky get wrong:

And while Palevsky claims he has never seen a patient with severe RSV, this is also the guy who believed that the 2019 measles outbreak in Brooklyn, the largest in 27 years, was a hoax and that none of the kids really had measles…

Be skeptical and don’t listen to these kinds of anti-vaccine influencers who are often getting paid to push this kind of misinformation.

Misinformation that can keep you from making an informed decision.

More on RSV and Monoclonal Antibodies

Exit mobile version